The general attitude among Texas Republicans toward the impeachment report prepared against Attorney General Ken Paxton is that they didn’t just already know some of it — they knew all of it.
Paxton is the most Trumpian figure in statewide politics in Texas. He is widely known for his ethics problems and all manner of lawsuits and investigations, but he is also a reliable transactional conservative — the sort to ask the conservative base, “is this the thing you want? Then I’ll do it, with gusto.” But his current travails, where he faces the real risk of impeachment for a litany of breaches, deceptions and inappropriate donations, are actually part of a broader, long-simmering war between Texas donor bases whose priorities often clash in Austin. Does he deserve to be impeached and removed? Maybe he does! But why is it happening in the final three days of the session in Texas?
The Bryan Slaton scandal is a trigger here. Slaton, a loudly socially conservative House member who was expelled for getting a nineteen-year-old intern drunk and having sex with her, was supported by some of the same financial backers who back Paxton. Did he deserve to be expelled? Of course. But the fact that he was kicked out rankled conservative supporters who viewed it as a shot across the bow from House Speaker Dade Phelan. Phelan is a moderate Republican whose priorities are maintaining power and kicking dirt in the face of what he views as the crazy wing of his party. In Texas, it’s fair to say that “crazy” wing is also known as “the base.”












