The New York Times hits out at panto

NYT combines its two favorite pastimes: snobbery and Brit bashing

pantomimes The New York Times building
The New York Times building is seen on September 6, 2018 in New York. – A furious Donald Trump called September 5, 2018 for the unmasking of an anonymous senior official who wrote in the New York Times that top members of his administration were undermining the president to curb his “misguided impulses.” Trump asked if the unsigned op-ed could be considered treasonous, assailed the newspaper for the “gutless” piece and questioned whether the senior official it was attributed to actually existed. “TREASON?” Trump posted in response to the article entitled “I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration,” which claimed the president’s own staff see him as a danger to the nation.”Does the so-called ‘Senior Administration Official’ really exist, or is (Photo by ANGELA WEISS / AFP) (Photo by ANGELA WEISS/AFP via Getty Images)

Pantomime has been an essential part of British theater for generations. Not only is it often a child’s first, magical experience of the stage, but it is also arguably one of the few consistently profitable sectors in the industry, that often props up theaters and other shows that don’t have the same financial heft.It was not surprising then that culture secretary Oliver Dowden made frequent mentions of pantomime on his broadcast round this morning, when discussing the British government’s new £1.57 billion ($1.97 billion) support package for the arts.It was a fact that appeared to…

Pantomime has been an essential part of British theater for generations. Not only is it often a child’s first, magical experience of the stage, but it is also arguably one of the few consistently profitable sectors in the industry, that often props up theaters and other shows that don’t have the same financial heft.

It was not surprising then that culture secretary Oliver Dowden made frequent mentions of pantomime on his broadcast round this morning, when discussing the British government’s new £1.57 billion ($1.97 billion) support package for the arts.

It was a fact that appeared to shock the New York Times though — whose coverage of Britain has been increasingly woeful in recent years. The paper’s ‘European Culture Editor’ commented today with disdain that:

UK culture secretary doing the rounds this morning to talk up the arts rescue package. Talked about pantomimes on BBC Breakfast, Today and Sky News. PANTOMIMES.’

It wasn’t entirely clear why the paper was surprised that a staple of the theater calendar would be discussed by the culture secretary, but it is par for the course for a paper that thinks Brits regularly eat boiled mutton for dinner.

[special_offer]

Still, he should be commended on his ability to combine two of the Times’s favorite pastimes: snobbish comment and bashing Brits.

This article was originally published on The Spectator

s UK website.

Comments
Share
Text
Text Size
Small
Medium
Large
Line Spacing
Small
Normal
Large